Category Archives: Scopes and Closures

Explaining JavaScript Scope And Closures


Scope refers to where variables and functions are accessible, and in what context it is being executed. Basically, a variable or function can be defined in a global or local scope. Variables have so-called function scope, and functions have the same scope as variables.

Global Scope

When something is global means that it is accessible from anywhere in your code. Take this for example:

var monkey = "Gorilla";

function greetVisitor () {
	return alert("Hello dear blog reader!");

If that code was being run in a web browser, the function scope would be window, thus making it available to everything running in that web browser window.

Local Scope

As opposed to the global scope, the local scope is when something is just defined and accessible in a certain part of the code, like a function. For instance;

function talkDirty () {
	var saying = "Oh, you little VB lover, you";
	return alert(saying);
alert(saying); // Throws an error

If you take a look at the code above, the variable saying is only available within the talkDirty function. Outside of it it isn’t defined at all. Note of caution: if you were to declare saying without the var keyword preceding it, it would automatically become a global variable.

What this also means is that if you have nested functions, the inner function will have access to the containing functions variables and functions:

function saveName (firstName) {
	function capitalizeName () {
		return firstName.toUpperCase();
	var capitalized = capitalizeName();
	return capitalized;
alert(saveName("Robert")); // Returns "ROBERT"

As you just saw, the inner function capitalizeName didn’t need any parameter sent in, but had complete access to the parameter firstName in the outer saveName function. For clarity, let’s take another example:

function siblings () {
	var siblings = ["John", "Liza", "Peter"];
	function siblingCount () {
		var siblingsLength = siblings.length;
		return siblingsLength;
	function joinSiblingNames () {
		return "I have " + siblingCount() + " siblings:\n\n" + siblings.join("\n");
	return joinSiblingNames();
alert(siblings()); // Outputs "I have 3 siblings: John Liza Peter"

As you just saw, both inner functions have access to the siblings array in the containing function, and each inner function have access to the other inner functions on the same level (in this case, joinSiblingNames can access siblingCount). However, the variable siblingsLength in the siblingCount is only available within that function, i.e. that scope.


Now when you hopefully have gotten a better grasp of what scope is, let’s add closures to the mix. Closures are expressions, usually functions, which can work with variables set within a certain context. Or, to try and make it easier, inner functions referring to local variables of its outer function create closures. For instance:

function add (x) {
	return function (y) {
		return x + y;
var add5 = add(5);
var no8 = add5(3);
alert(no8); // Returns 8

Whoa, whoa! What just happened? Let’s break it down:

  1. When the add function is called, it returns a function.
  2. That function closes the context and remembers what the parameter x was at exactly that time (i.e. 5 in the code above)
  3. When the result of calling the add function is assigned to the variable add5, it will always know what x was when it was initially created.
  4. The add5 variable above refers to a function which will always add the value 5 to what is being sent in.
  5. That means when add5 is called with a value of 3, it will add 5 together with 3, and return 8.

So, in the world of JavaScript, the add5 function actually looks like this in reality:

function add5 (y) {
	return 5 + y;

The Infamous Loop Problem

How many times have you created some sort of loop where you wanted to assign the value of i in some way, e.g. to an element, and found out it just returned the last value i had?

Incorrect Reference

Let’s take a look at this faulty code, which creates 5 a elements, adds the value of i as a text to each element and an onclick which is expected to alert the value of i for that link, i.e. the same value as in the a element’s text. It then appends them to your document body:

function addLinks () {
	for (var i=0, link; i

Each a element gets the correct text, i.e. “Link 0″, “Link 1″ and so on. But whichever link you click, it alerts the number “5″. Oh my God, why? The reason for this is that the variable i get its value increased with 1 for each iteration of the loop, and since the onclick event isn’t being executed, just applied to the a element, it adds up.

Therefore, the loop continues until i is 5, which is the last value of i before the function addLinks exits. Then, whenever the onclick event is actually being triggered, it takes the last value of i.

Working Reference

What you want to do instead is create a closure, so that when you apply the value of i to the onclick event of the a element, it gets the exact value of i at just that moment in time. Like this:

function addLinks () {
	for (var i=0, link; i<5; i++) {
		link = document.createElement("a");
		link.innerHTML = "Link " + i;
		link.onclick = function (num) {
			return function () {
window.onload = addLinks;

Here is another version of addLinks():

function addLinks () {

for (var onclick = function(num){return function(){alert(num)}}, i=0, link; i<5; i++) {

link = document.createElement("a");

link.innerHTML = "Link " + i;

link.onclick = onclick(i);




onload = addLinks;

With this code, if you click the first a element it will alert “0″, the second “1″ etc; just what you probably expected with the first code I showed you to do. The solution here is that the inner function of what’s applied to the onclick event create a closure where it references the parameter num, i.e. what the i variable is at just that time.

That function then closes with that value safely tucked away, and can then return its corresponding number when the onclick event is being called.

Self-Invoking Functions

Self-invoking functions are functions who execute immediately, and create their own closure. Take a look at this:

(function () {
	var dog = "German Shepherd";
alert(dog); // Returns undefined

Ok, so the dog variable was only available within that context. Big deal, man, hidden dogs… But, my friends, this is where it becomes really interesting!

Yahoo JavaScript Module Pattern

The gist of the pattern is that it uses a self-invoking function to create a closure, hence making it possible to have private and public properties and methods. A simple example:

var person = function () {
	// Private
	var name = "Robert";
	return {
		getName : function () {
			return name;
		setName : function (newName) {
			name = newName;
alert(; // Undefined
alert(person.getName()); // "Robert"
person.setName("Robert Nyman");
alert(person.getName()); // "Robert Nyman"

The beauty of this is that you now can decide on your own what will be publicly visible for your object (and can be overwritten), and what is private and no one can access nor alter. The variable name above is hidden outside the context of the function, but accessible from the returned getName respectively setName functions, since they create closures where they have a reference to the name variable.

Leave a comment

Posted by on June 13, 2011 in JavaScript, Scopes and Closures


Closures to Extend Variable Scope

Closures in JavaScript are a fairly straightforward concept, and have been discussed online in a number of in-depth articles. The fact that they are straightforward doesn’t necessarily mean they’re simple however, as seen by the extensive articles that cover the subject. To create a closure, you nest a function inside of a function. That inner function has access to all variables in its parent function’s scope. This comes in handy when creating methods and properties in object oriented scripts. Here is a simple example that demonstrates the use of a closure:

function myObject() {
  this.property1 = "value1";
  this.property2 = "value2";
  var newValue = this.property1;
 this.performMethod = function() { myMethodValue = newValue; return myMethodValue; };
  var myObjectInstance = new myObject();

The key portions of the script are the nested anonymous function are highlighted in bold and the method call in the alert function (last line). Because the method in the alert is actually calling a nested function, that method is able to read the value of the variable called newValue, even thought that variable is not within the scope of the anonymous function, or method.

Developers use closures all the time, probably unknowingly, since a closure is created any time an anonymous function is nested inside another function and utilizes variables from the parent function’s scope. The power of the closure is revealed when that method (the inner function) is called, and values that normally wouldn’t be accessible are within “regional” scope and are thus able to be used as any other value.

Leave a comment

Posted by on June 13, 2011 in JavaScript, Scopes and Closures